When the pandemic hit, lock down orders, BLM protests, and stop the steal election rhetoric allowed for militant neoconservatism to provide a solution to the anomic state of confusion and chaos.
ANOMIE AMELIE FRENCH MOVIE SOCIOLOGY CODE
Durkheim’s solutions would be to heal the collective consciousness and return to a normal DL by focusing on policies that equalize opportunity, whereas DuBois would focus on solving the race issue first, then undertake a project that reshapes the moral order and allows for a just distribution of wants.īefore the events at the US capitol occured, as Wallace-Wells explains in his article, the efforts to “unite the right” have been a work in progress that have offered a solution-as Durkheim would have it-for the white working class to alleviate the lack of clarity of norms and confusion of the social code that the anomic DL has been producing in the US (Wallace-Wells: 2). DuBois, on the other hand, would directly link the role that capital has played in driving enmity among racial lines to distract from the material conditions they’ve created which have in turn amplified hate. Here’s a snippet for a paper I just wrote that touches on your question:ĭurkheim would understand the underlying causes of the insurrection at the capitol as being the result of the anomic division of labor (DL) and its production of a bifurcated collective consciousness that has been integrated and legitimized with the deep story of the American right.
ANOMIE AMELIE FRENCH MOVIE SOCIOLOGY PDF
pdf and other download-ing links with the filetype. Got a question that doesn't quite fit /r/sociology? Ask the larger Social Sciences community at /r/asksocialscience. Not a sociologist? We welcome your participation, but users just spitballing or pushing an ideology may be banned to maintain standards of discourse. An online community of sociology enthusiasts is not a representative sample for pretty much anything, and as a result most surveys are not appropriate here: we are not going to help you do bad research. As above, we're not really here to help you do your homework, which is why we ask for your own content included and the actual standards are subjective. If you feel you’re the latter rather than the former, please don’t be surprised if we don’t agree.įoster discussion - aim to use postings as a source and have discussion in the comments, if the article particularly slanted or ideologically bent, this cuts off discussion: try submitting source material instead and include your preferred interpretation in the comments. There’s a lot of youtube channels, bloggers, and authors deserving of attention. Videos & blogs - context up front: there are a lot of very superficial “sociology” posts used more to promote a youtube channel, blogger, or author. Theory, content, and book reviews - need to add significant depth, context, or in-field relevance or critique of an established or topical work reviews should be used to grow knowledge, not promote a work, a reviewer, or an institution: the primary content needs to exist in the submission, the submission should not be urging the reader to ‘read more at _’ or ‘see more in my upcoming book, _’. Simply explaining an event as 'social behaviour' is not meeting a high-enough bar. Sociological interpretations may need to examine issue via multiple lenses or theories, for instance the “interpretation” should not be aiming to push a specific narrative or viewpoint. Some news around Sociology may be ok, but consider if all or most references to sociology could be changed to any other field and the core of the article would still make sense, it’s probably not sociological enough.Ĭurrent events - sociological explanation or exploration, focus again on the sociology more than the event itself. Sociological focus & content - the sociological thought needs to be primary focus. Having a question related to the topic is rarely sufficient. We are happy to talk Sociology with anyone, but we're not here to pad your reading list or do your homework for you. We ask that posts contain actual sociological content.
For those interested in the study of groups, society, culture, social interactions, etc.
0 kommentar(er)
